Story

What is your strategy when working with the other party that sends through ChatGPT arguments and lengthy responses to each of your real, well-thought-out, and grounded-in-decades-of-experience requests?

I have a friend that recently complained about the other party wasting time by generating huge lists of things that need to be evaluated and refuted. Does this happen with opposing counsel from larger firms that deal with bigger cases where the lawyers generally communicate directly? Do you have any experience dealing with this in smaller cases?